News

R3PACK Consortium backs BPA ban

9 Apr 2024

The EU-funded research project, R3PACK, urges a ban on Bisphenol A (BPA) and calls for rigorous rules, promoting transparency and prioritising health and the environment.

The R3PACK Consortium advocates for the elimination of BPA and other harmful substances from food and beverages. Additionally, it emphasises the importance of promoting transparency in chemical management and risk analysis to protect public health and the environment, calling for policymakers to prioritise these efforts.

R3PACK Consortium backs BPA ban
© AdobeStock/monticellllo

R3PACK, a project funded by the EU Horizon programme, aims to create novel fibre-based packaging, and increase the adoption of reuse schemes. The Consortium brings together 34 organisations from seven countries and draws on the expertise and experience of industry players throughout the food value chain, including packaging manufacturers and retailers.

In March 2024, R3PACK provided feedback on the European Commission’s (EC) public consultation prohibiting BPA in food contact materials (FCMs).

A harmful threat

BPA, a hazardous chemical, is found in plastics and resins used in many food and beverage packaging. Unfortunately, this chemical can enter the food and beverages it comes in contact with, ultimately entering the human body and posing a significant risk to human health.

“The risks of BPA for food and beverage consumers include potential adverse effects on the immune system, fertility, hormonal systems, and skin allergies,” Francisco de Araújo Vasquez, project and policy officer at Safe Food Advocacy Europe (SAFE), told Ingredients Network.

Moreover, recent research suggests a possible link between BPA exposure and childhood obesity, indicating its role in promoting different microbial communities that may pose risks, Vasquez adds.

Research also indicates that micro- and nano-plastics have the potential to contaminate agricultural soils, irrigation water, and oceans with BPA. Living organisms can then absorb this contaminant, leading to its entry into the food chain. Implementing the Commission’s proposed ban is, therefore, crucial. The ban would protect the environment and the human food chain, essential for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, SAFE indicates.

Embracing a comprehensive approach

The R3PACK Consortium says the sector needs to take several steps regarding the ban of BPA to promote transparency and prioritise public health and the environment.

SAFE says a far-reaching approach to eliminating harmful substances such as BPAs, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and phthalates are essential. One effective way to promote safety in recycling processes is to gradually phase out these substances from primary articles and embrace circularity.

Consumers should also have access to transparent and freely available information about food and beverage products’ chemical content. Providing this information enables consumers to make informed decisions based on accurate information, promoting sustainable consumption practices, SAFE says.

The industry also needs to consider the interactions between various hazardous substances found in the environment and food to enhance the accuracy of risk analysis. Relying solely on a single-point risk analysis may not accurately assess consumer exposure to harmful substances. Therefore, SAFE calls for a multi-faceted analysis system for a more precise evaluation.

Demand for stricter rules and regulations

The European Commission (EC) recently closed a feedback period on its draft act prohibiting BPA use in FCMs across the EU.

“Stricter rules and regulations are required due to the widespread presence of BPA in consumer products and the environment, as highlighted by studies showing detectable levels of BPA in the urine of a significant percentage of Europeans,” Vasquez says.

Furthermore, SAFE says that BPA and other microplastics pose health risks and have been found in human tissue samples, arteries, and the food chain, necessitating urgent action to mitigate exposure.

Credit: © AdobeStock/jpldesigns© AdobeStock/jpldesigns

The decision comes after the European Environment Agency released a study in 2023 that discovered approximately 92% of European adults have elevated levels of BPA in their bodies. These levels exceeded the maximum recommended limits the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) set.

The EC’s initiative emerged following the EFSA opinion, which indicates a concern for human health. If adopted, the initiative will ban the use of BPA in FCMs, including plastic and coated packaging, across the EU. Along with the ban, the initiative would address using other bisphenols in FCMs to prevent the sector from replacing BPA with other harmful substances. It would also set out derogations and transitional periods that may apply to food and beverage businesses.

“Policymakers can improve the landscape by implementing bans on BPA and other harmful substances in consumer products, adopting the precautionary principle, and enforcing stricter requirements on chemicals to ensure consumer and environmental safety,” says Vasquez.

“Additionally, improving risk analysis by considering interactions between different hazardous substances and enhancing transparency in chemical management and risk analysis are essential steps,” Vasquez adds.

Responsive manufacturing approaches

If these changes are implemented, SAFE says food and beverage manufacturers will need to adapt their production processes to comply with stricter regulations. This could potentially lead to the reformulation of products or the adoption of alternative packaging materials free from BPA and other harmful substances.

“However, these changes are necessary to ensure consumer safety and promote sustainable consumption practices,” Vasquez says.

“If stricter regulations are not implemented, consumers should take proactive measures to minimise their exposure to BPA by choosing products with BPA-free packaging,” Vasquez adds. However, Vasquez says this approach requires research and cannot be easily done. Currently, packaging containing BPA is not explicitly required to be marked as such in the EU, SAFE’s project and policy officer adds.

“Avoiding heating food in plastic containers and opting for fresh or minimally processed foods whenever possible” are also vital recommendations, Vasquez says.

Additionally, staying informed about the presence of BPA and other harmful substances in consumer products can help consumers make informed choices to protect their health.

Related news

Is the price of a sustainable and healthy diet… unsustainable?

Is the price of a sustainable and healthy diet… unsustainable?

4 Mar 2025

Healthier foods are more than twice as expensive per calorie as less healthy foods, with healthier food increasing in price at twice the rate in the past two years.

Read more 
Does calorie labelling lead to reduced consumption?

Does calorie labelling lead to reduced consumption?

27 Feb 2025

Calorie labelling of food products leads to a small, but consistent, reduction in the number of calories consumed, a study suggests.

Read more 
Brands, retailers, and countries remain divided over Nutri-Score labels

Brands, retailers, and countries remain divided over Nutri-Score labels

30 Jan 2025

Europe's supermarkets and manufacturers are far from aligned over a standarised approach to nutrition labelling. Some welcome the non-mandatory Nutri-Score labels with open arms, while others have “considerable concerns”.

Read more 
EU Parliament passes stricter packaging rules

EU Parliament passes stricter packaging rules

20 Jan 2025

The European Parliament voted to approve updates to the packaging and packaging waste regulation, including enforceable re-use targets, limits on certain single-use packaging types, and restrictions on the use of PFAS “forever chemicals”.

Read more 
Louis Drefyus Company powers on in plant-based with BASF ingredients acquisition

Louis Drefyus Company powers on in plant-based with BASF ingredients acquisition

17 Jan 2025

BASF has agreed to sell its food and health performance ingredients business to Louis Dreyfus Company (LDC).

Read more 
Major Belgian retailers promise standardised, reusable packaging at scale

Major Belgian retailers promise standardised, reusable packaging at scale

16 Jan 2025

Albert Heijn, Aldi, Carrefour, Colruyt, Delhaize, and Lidl have launched a new reusable packaging coalition that aims to accelerate the use of reusable packaging, starting with mushrooms.

Read more 
Kraft Heinz, Mondelēz, Coca-Cola, and Nestlé accused of marketing ‘addictive’ UPFs at children

Kraft Heinz, Mondelēz, Coca-Cola, and Nestlé accused of marketing ‘addictive’ UPFs at children

15 Jan 2025

Major food manufacturers have been hit with a first-of-its-kind lawsuit alleging that they specifically engineer their ultra-processed foods (UPFs) to be addictive, and that they market the products towards children.

Read more 
FDA reviews red food colour additive, Red No.3

FDA reviews red food colour additive, Red No.3

9 Jan 2025

Amid considerations to tighten regulations around artificial ingredients, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is exploring a potential ban on particular type of red food dye.

Read more 
Sperri builds investment momentum with US expansion plans

Sperri builds investment momentum with US expansion plans

7 Jan 2025

Hailed as Canada’s first organic and allergen-free plant-based meal replacement drink, food-as-medicine brand Sperri progresses its efforts to enter the US market.

Read more 
Is it time for a global definition of whole grain?

Is it time for a global definition of whole grain?

30 Dec 2024

Amid a lack of harmonisation, the European Food Information Council (EUFIC) is calling for a global definition of the term whole grain to end consumer confusion.

Read more