News
EU issues Mondelēz with €337.5 million antitrust fine
6 Jun 2024Mondelēz International has received a multi-million fine for hindering cross-border trade of its products, causing consumers to pay more for its products.
On 23 May 2024, the European Commission announced it had fined Mondelēz €337.5 million for hindering cross-border trade of chocolate, biscuits and coffee goods between member states. In April 2024, it was reported that the leading chocolate and biscuit producer would receive a fine for blocking cross-border sales .

In a speech on the adoption of the antitrust decision against Mondelēz for cross-border trade restrictions, Margrethe Vestager, executive vice-president in charge of competition policy, said: “We find that Mondelēz illegally restricted retailers from sourcing these products from member states where prices are lower,” Vestager said. “This allowed Mondelēz to maintain higher prices. This harmed consumers, who ended up paying more for chocolate, biscuits, and coffee,” Vestager added.
In light of the ongoing cost-of-living crisis and the principles surrounding the free movement of goods in the single market, Vestager said consumers have the right to buy cheaper products when they can be sourced at a cheaper price elsewhere in the EU. In addition, she said they should be free to do so in supermarkets when retailers import the cheaper product.
“Any company that hinders this freedom engages in illegal behaviour and should be sanctioned accordingly,” Vestager said. Mondelēz’s actions signal a breach of EU competition rules, and the Commission “remains committed to bringing down unjustified barriers to ensure a better functioning of the single market”, she added.
In breach of anticompetition laws
US-headquartered Mondelēz is one of the world’s largest chocolate and biscuit producers. While the company’s name may be unfamiliar to consumers, its portfolio of brands— which span Oreo, Toblerone, Côte d’Or, Milka, Ritz, and TUC—are well-known household names.
Following the Commission’s investigation, it found Mondelēz in breach of EU competition rules in two key ways. Firstly, engaging in anticompetitive agreements or concerted practices restricting cross-border trade of various chocolate, biscuits and coffee products. Secondly, the Commission said Mondelēz had violated the rules by abusing its dominant position in certain national markets to sell chocolate tablets.
“Such illegal practices allowed Mondelēz to continue charging more for its own products, to the ultimate detriment of consumers in the EU,” the EU Commission said in a press release.
In response to Ingredient Network, an EU Commission’s spokesperson highlighted its position on the ruling and its potential impact on parallel trade.
Vestager said: “Prices for food differ between member states. Trade over borders of member states in the internal market can lower prices and increase the availability of products for consumers. This is especially important in times of high inflation.
“In today’s decision, we find that Mondelēz illegally limited cross-border sales across the EU. Mondelez did so to maintain higher prices for its products to the detriment of consumers. We have therefore fined Mondelēz €337.5 million.”
The Commission started exploring the case in 2019, conducting inspections at Mondelēz’s business premises.
Reaching the multi-million fine amount
Detailing the fine level, the Commission noted that the infringements covered a large part of the EU and lasted between 2006 and 2020, except for coffee products, which Mondelēz divested in 2015.
“In setting the level of the fine, the Commission took into account the gravity and duration of the infringements as well as the value of Mondelēz’ sales relating to the latter,” the Commission said. It also considered that this type of behaviour has already been sanctioned. “This is really not a novel case,” said Vestager.
The legislators based Mondelēz’s €337.5 million fine on its 2006 Guidelines on fines. In reaching this decision, the Commission considered Mondelēz’s cooperation with the Commission under its cooperation procedure, in which the confectionery giant expressly acknowledged its liability for the infringement of EU competition rules. As a result, the Commission granted Mondelēz a 15% fine reduction.
Preventing parallel trade
Parallel trade is when traders and retailers try to buy products in countries with lower prices and then trade them to markets with higher prices. Consequently, parallel trade typically results in price drops in countries where those products’ prices are higher. These price drops mean savings for customers at the checkout. Parallel trade, therefore, works to lower prices, increase competition, and strengthen consumer choice.
Restrictions on where products can be sold subsequently restrict parallel trade. Restrictions to such parallel trade prevent national markets from becoming isolated and lower product diversity. Without the relevant anticompetition laws in place, manufacturers or suppliers would be able to charge higher prices, impacting consumers’ pockets.
The EU Commission states: “Restrictions to parallel trade amount to non-regulatory barriers to a better functioning of the single market and are among the most serious restrictions of competition.”
Advocating for anticompetition
“We are determined to uphold the fundamental freedoms in the EU and to ensure that EU citizens have access to the biggest variety at the lowest prices that the market can offer,” Vestager said.
The European Commissioner for Competition says several ongoing investigations are taking place in the food and beverage sector, including food delivery services and energy drinks.
The EU Commission has created a whistleblower tool designed to make it easier for consumers to report anticompetitive behaviour. With enabling anonymity vital, the tool uses a specifically developed encrypted messaging system that allows two-way communications.
Related news

HFSS product placement regulation hits unhealthy food displays
6 Mar 2025
The proportion of space used to display HFSS foods in UK supermarkets fell following the introduction of regulations restricting the location of product promotions, research shows.
Read more
Smaller snack sizes represent big growth opportunity for PepsiCo
5 Mar 2025
Brands are responding to consumer demand for healthier products by developing classic snacks in smaller portion sizes, meaning fewer calories, lower sodium, and lower fat.
Read more
Is the price of a sustainable and healthy diet… unsustainable?
4 Mar 2025
Healthier foods are more than twice as expensive per calorie as less healthy foods, with healthier food increasing in price at twice the rate in the past two years.
Read more
Marks & Spencer brings ‘brain foods’ to the retail space
3 Mar 2025
Marks & Spencer is capitalising on increased consumer interest in “brain food” with the launch of a new product range designed to support cognitive health.
Read more
Does calorie labelling lead to reduced consumption?
27 Feb 2025
Calorie labelling of food products leads to a small, but consistent, reduction in the number of calories consumed, a study suggests.
Read more
Have scientists discovered a new tool to measure UPFs?
19 Feb 2025
Researchers have developed a new scoring system and database, compiling over 50,000 food items, of which over 1,000 are classified as ultra-processed.
Read more
Disruptor brands spearhead sustainable solutions
11 Feb 2025
Manufacturers, big and small, sharpen their focus by providing sustainable products and services centred on comprehensive and sustainable approaches to traditional methods.
Read more
Leading regulatory updates in Asia in 2025
7 Feb 2025
As we head into 2025, numerous legislators around Asia are suggesting and solidifying legal updates and changes that will impact the food and beverage space.
Read more
Singapore introduces Food Safety and Security Bill
3 Feb 2025
Amid growing food safety concerns and supply chain disruptions, the Singapore Food Agency passes its Food Safety and Security Bill (FSSB) to provide greater clarity, assurance, and credibility.
Read more
Brands, retailers, and countries remain divided over Nutri-Score labels
30 Jan 2025
Europe's supermarkets and manufacturers are far from aligned over a standarised approach to nutrition labelling. Some welcome the non-mandatory Nutri-Score labels with open arms, while others have “considerable concerns”.
Read more